l

Republican Regional Flag

The Republicans

REPUBLICAN PARTY  OF GREAT  BRITAIN

www.republicanparty.org.uk

VIRTUE                            FREEDOM                              ASPIRATION                            WEALTH                            PEACE
Rediscovering the Great British Republican Tradition

REPUBLICANISM       CONSTITUTION        DEBT FREE MONEY      IDEALS      INSTITUTIONS       DEMOCRACY

The Future of Britain Republican News Stories

JOIN NOW

 

 

========

Or just:

 

RECEIVE WEEKLY

NEWSLETTER

Your email address:

ORDER NOW

============

GO TO PREVIOUS NEWSLETTERS

 

============

 NEWSLETTER ESSAYS

Go to Subject

 

Under construction

============

For a full account of Civic and Constitutional Republicanism visit:

 

A CIVIC REPUBLICAN MANIFESTO 2009

 

 

============

For links to stories of interest to Civic and Constitutional Republicans visit:

 

CIVIC REPUBLICANS AT NEWSVINE

 

============

ELECTORAL REFORM

 

Kellowian Weighted Representation

How it works?

 

============

A CIVIC REPUBLICAN PROGRAMME

 

Under construction

 

Why we need a Republican Party

Traditional British Republican Marching Flag

Britain will one day be a Republic. No one believes the constitutional monarchy will last for ever. In an unpredictable, ever-changing world this day may come sooner than anyone thinks.

But one thing is certain. Come it will.

No current major political party is capable of facing up to this fact. We are ill-prepared to transform Britain into a republic. That is why we need to have a mature debate about the nature of the future British Republic. That is why we need a British Republican Party

Republicanism is an ancient tradition. From the beginning its purpose was above all to prevent any leader having excessive power. The Republican solution to this problem was to separate power at the top so that no one individual could accumulate too much power. This is the solution that almost all republics have always adopted.

The other great Republican invention is to proclaim that the state does not consist of a person or an office. The constitution is the state. In republics citizens have a powerful sense of their constitution. It is the constitution that protects the people from authoritarianism.

In Britain today we need more than ever that protection. Because of our lack of a republican constitution, successive Prime Ministers have assumed more and more dictatorial powers. As long ago as 1978 Lords Hailsham said that the office of Prime Minister is an "elective dictatorship". Since then things have worsened.

As they have assumed more and more power, New Labour and Prime Minister Brown have created an ever more far-reaching bureaucracy to control our lives and have ridden roughshod over the House of Commons. But they have just been continuing a process set in train by the Conservatives before them.

As historian, David Starkey, said in December 2008,

"The House of Commons, is now managed by the government totally, absolutely and completely."

This could not happen under a Presidential Republican constitution as power at the top has to be shared.

In theory, the British Prime Minister, shares power with the head of state, the monarch. But because a hereditary monarch cannot exercise its considerable powers, all of its power goes to the Prime Minister. This is why we must replace the monarch with an elected President with full powers to balance those of the Prime Minister and Parliament.

This is sometimes called the American system. But that is wrong. The American founding fathers based their Constitution on the British system substituting the monarch with an elected President. Fundamentally the American system followed the British system.

Nowadays there is a widespread feeling that there is something radically wrong with British political life. We have lost faith in our politicians. Voter turnout is at an all time low. The major political parties have played out all their political ideas and in the process heaped destruction on the social, cultural and economic lives of many. The sense of failure, hopelessness and lack of direction is all-pervading.

The Republican Party is the party of constitutional change but it must be more than that. It must have a full set of policies to challenge the old defunct parties.

We need a programme that recognises what is of immense value in our society and seeks to refashion it according to the republican principles of virtue, freedom, opportunity, prosperity and peace

Why The Austerity Programme Will Not Work

 

 

The big story of last week everywhere (including this newsletter) was the introduction of the ConLib coalition’s “austerity” measures. Many were congratulating the new coalition on their resoluteness in tackling the deficit and being prepared to put the British people through untold hardship to do it. But barely as soon as the sense of muted relief at the adoption of the programme had arrived, the doubts started to emerge. Would the measures work? Would they perhaps even make things worse? Would it all be for nothing?

 

Posted 9th July 2010

 

Read Full Story...

 

Comments received: 1

 

 

Deficit Terrorists Strike in Britain

 

 

Ellen Brown (American author of Web of Debt) has produced another penetrating article which has a link below, She writes “Britain's new coalition government [is] imposing on itself the sort of fiscal austerity that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) has long imposed on Third World countries, and has more recently imposed on European countries, including Latvia, Iceland, Ireland and Greece. Where those countries were forced into compliance by their creditors, however, Britain has tightened the screws voluntarily, having succumbed to the argument that it must pay down its debts to maintain the market for its bonds.”

 

Posted Friday 02 July 2010

 

Read Full Story...

 

Comments received: 1

 

 

ELECTION SPECIAL - How The Kellowian Weighted Representations Electoral System Would Change The May 2010 Result

 

 

The election result that the voters delivered on Thursday has produced a “fine old mess”. It is difficult to see how the LibDems can form an alliance or coalition with the Conservatives as the latter are implacably opposed to the main condition of any pact with the LibDems – real progress toward "proportional representation". A pact between the LibDems and  Labour would not produce a government with a majority and would lack authority in practically every sense imaginable.

 

Read Full Story...

 

     
What is Republicanism?

The three kinds of Republicanism

File:M-T-Cicero.jpg       

Marcus Tullius Cicero 106 - 43 BCE

The word "republicanism" has been used at various times to mean different things, but there remain three essential usages.

The three usages are not mutually exclusive but indicate the a successive narrowing of the scope. Starting with the broadest meaning, these are:

1. Civic Republicanism.  Civic Republicanism embodies an ancient concept of republicanism that goes back to Cicero and Aristotle. Civic Republicans start by arguing that in order to achieve a good society we need to encourage virtue. This begs the question: how can we create virtue in a secular society? In a religious societies virtue was encouraged by the expectation of reward in the afterlife but clearly this will not do in a "modern" secular society. Civic Republicans argue that virtue can be encouraged in a secular society by correctly designing our institutions. These institutions can be divided into (a) institutions that make up the government and (b) the institutions that make up the civil society.

2. Constitutional Republicanism. Constitutional Republicanism concerns itself primarily with (a), the institutions that make up the government, that is to say, the constitution. Its goal is to design the constitution so as to create a just relationship between all citizens. Constitutional republicans recognise that a primary danger all societies face is the development of excessive power in the hands of its leader or leaders (executive) which then threatens the goal of justice. This concentration of power is avoided (a) by creating separate institutions of government having separate powers and (b) by rotating executive offices. Monarchy is incompatible with (b) and so anti-monarchism inherently forms part of constitutional republicanism.

3. Anti-Monarchist Republicanism. Anti-Monarchist Republicanism confines itself to this last aspect of constitutional republicanism, the desire to abolish the constitutional position of the monarchy. It usually little concerned with the constitution that will follow abolition. If it has a view on the future constitution it will tend to favour one that preserves as much of the pre-abolition constitution as possible. It has nothing to say about the broader issues natural to civic republicanism. Thus it maintains a narrow focus on the single issue of abolition without addressing the wider concerns of either constitutional or civic republicanism.

Single issue parties exist. But, for a party to be long lasting and for it to lay down a tradition, it must embrace the whole range of issues that society faces. For this reason the Republican Party must include Civic Republicanism and Constitutional Republicanism. It must advocate the abolition of the constitutional role of the monarchy, but its primary focus has to be the construction of the society and the constitution that follows abolition

 

A President with Full Powers

A "parliamentary" republic will not do

File:Buckingham Palace - May 2006.jpg

Buckingham Palace - The people's new presidential seat

(with the forbidding parade ground turned into a landscaped front garden)

 

There are basically two types of Modern Republic – a presidential republic and a parliamentary republic. With a presidential republic there is a clear separation of power between the Legislature and the Executive. With a parliamentary system the Executive, or Head of State, is compounded with the Legislature. The legislature chooses the Executive – as here parliament chooses the Prime Minister.

Why have most republics always favoured a presidential system with a separation of powers? Because republicans see that the main problem of any state is the accumulation of excessive executive power - dictatorship. By separating the power, dictatorship can be avoided.

Under a parliamentary system, such as we already have, there is no separation of power, and so more and more power accumulates with the executive.

Currently we have an office of Prime Minister which has far more power than the leader of any other liberal democracy. Amazingly the Prime Minister can even make changes to the constitution as easily as they pass statutes. This situation would be preserved in a parliamentary republic

But why are some present republics parliamentary republics?

Of the republics comparable in size to Britain in the developed world there are only two such– Germany and Italy.

Germany and Italy after the Second World War both adopted a parliamentary system for the same reason. Both had a recent history of fascist dictatorship and they did not want an office of President as it might - within their very special circumstances - come to resemble another dictator

Anti-monarchist republicans often entertain a parliamentary republic with a purely ceremonial president? But, for one thing, you simply will not get good quality candidates coming forward to take up such a meaningless post. It would not command respect.

And the dangers of a second restoration would be real. For look at what happened before with our first republic in the seventeenth century. Parliament initially took all power onto itself. Following that all power went to the executive (Protector). There was never a proper separation of power. The stage was set for a restoration

Existing parliamentary republics like Ireland and Germany do not have this problem as they do not have a recent monarch waiting in the wings to return as Britain would have.

Only with a democratically elected president with full powers and installed in Buckingham Palace as the Presidential Seat can the republic be guaranteed

Currently we do not elect our leader, The party machines do that for us.

It should be our democratic right, our republican right, to directly elect our leader - separate from parliament

And we must elect a president with full powers.

 

 

     
Why a Republic has to mean a Federal Republic

Equal Autonomous Regions and Equal  Regional Parliaments with Tax Raising Powers

Regional Flag of United Republic of Great Britain

Under construction

 

Only a Republican Constitution can give us Debt Free Money

Private banks will no longer be able to create money at will

 

Under construction

 

Our Long and Distinguished Republican Tradition

Under construction